Welcome to my leadership blog. Ideas have consequences and the goal of this blog is to discuss ideas of consequence. Some ideas you may agree with and some you may disagree. No worries. The only rule is that you think and discuss in a civil manner. People who attack others only prove they have reached the limit of their logic. The Bible states, "Iron sharpens iron" and we will sharpen one another by what we read, write and think. The goal of this blog is to help us identify and follow truth in all areas of our lives. I encourage you to join our leadership discussion and transform yourself and others through the renewing of our minds.
View Article  Trust, Delegation & Productivity

I read a fantastic leadership article on the power of trust to improve working relationships in any business or team.  Chris Brady and I have taught a principle for years called, “Slow to go fast.”   We meant that you have to slow down and build the relationship before you can accomplish any great task.  My personal attitude is that I want to be friends first and then team partners.  I am not interested in shallow non-trusting relationships.  I desire deep meaningful relationships with people who will go to bat for one another when the chips are down.  This has been one of the biggest blessings for Laurie and me – we have some of the deepest and trusting relationships with many super people.  Trust is earned by showing trust first and this article does a great job in describing the art of earning trust!  Read the article and evaluate how you are doing with this leadership essential – Trust.  God Bless, Orrin Woodward

 

Trust is an essential basis for a productive, satisfying and fun business environment. Suspicion corrodes working relationships and undermines people’s confidence in themselves and their colleagues. Leaders need to offer trust, since the only way to prove whether others are trustworthy or not is by experience. Organizational leaders have nearly all the power, so it’s usually up to them to set the ball rolling. Trust is always a gift. As a leader, you need to be the one who begins the giving process.

 

What does it take to initiate a process of trust? Courage, certainly, and the willingness to take a risk.  Employees, who have been denied trust, maybe for years, don’t find it easy to accept responsibility in an instant. You’ll need to help them rebuild their confidence in themselves. You’ll probably have to deal with more than few cynics as well: people who claim to approve the idea of trust, yet constantly find reasons why it shouldn’t be this person, in this circumstance, at this time.

 

Risks versus Rewards

There are always risks involved in offering trust. Some people—very few, in my experience—will consciously abuse your trust. If so, you may also need the courage and wisdom to refuse to allow the actions of a tiny minority to shape the way you deal with everyone. Others may stumble and betray your trust without intending to. You need to be willing to show them mercy and provide help, not instant condemnation. It’s easy to focus primarily on the negative possibilities: the people who will not live up to the trust placed in them. In reality, the potential for positive outcomes is high enough to tilt the balance of advantage that way.

 

The results of trust abused are obvious. You find yourself blamed for being “naive” and “too soft.” You suffer a loss of credibility and political standing. You may have to deal with a problem you didn’t expect, or try to reverse losses that might have been avoided by putting less trust in others.

 

But what are the risks on the other side: The risks of creating a culture marked by chronic lack of trust? Those risks include:

 

A culture of obsessive secrecy, so important information is not shared and unnecessary mistakes are common.

 

An organization where all significant decisions, (particularly financial ones), must be referred upwards, clogging senior management time and slowing progress to a snail's pace.

 

A “silo” organization, with little or no sharing of information between departments, so the wheel is regularly re-invented.

 

Internal competitiveness that swamps efforts at co-operation and takes attention away from competing in the marketplace.

 

Growing numbers of “in groups” and cliques that wreck communication and distract the organization through excessive political partisanship.

 

Resulting strong class consciousness between “insiders” and the rest.

 

A culture of protecting your butt first and getting results or serving the customer last.

 

Staffs that are paid to do jobs they don’t do fully, because their bosses don’t trust them, so do the work themselves instead.

 

Saving Time

Building trust takes time, but far less than is wasted by needing to check every significant piece of work and do more work you than makes any sense. Part of the deluge of work swamping leaders is due to lack of trust in their subordinates. Delegation no longer seems an option.

 

The more time leaders spend with their people, the more likely they’ll feel they can trust them. It’s human nature to be somewhat suspicious of those we don’t know very well. You can’t guarantee that giving your staff more time will always increase mutual feelings of trust, but it’s bound to help. A little time invested in this way can save a lot of time later, when staff truly does what they are supposed to do, and take much of the burden of routine work away from those in more senior positions.

 

There’s a bonus to creating trust. When your staff trusts you, they will look out for you. Many a leader has been saved from bad mistakes—and not a few political ambushes by rivals—because of timely warnings by alert subordinates.

 

Whom Do You Value?

Trusting someone is essential to valuing them. Imagine saying to someone, “I truly value your contribution to our team . . . but I don’t actually trust you.” There’s no value without trust. That goes for customers as much as employees. All those fine words and positive feelings about valuing the customer are destroyed in an instant by a single instance where the customer realizes he or she isn’t trusted. Exactly the same happens with employees. The message is quickly spread that nobody is really valued by the organization, save those in the charmed circle at the top.

 

Command-and-control executives display little or no trust towards anyone other then themselves and their chosen cronies. This exacerbates the “us” versus “them” attitudes that mistrust produces. Add to this the “audit mentality” that prevails in many businesses, and you have an attitude that those not found to be untrustworthy have simply been too clever to get caught (yet). The “audit mentality” usually defines most financial decision as significant and requires them to be referred to one of a handful of officers given the authority to spend money. If you can’t trust managers to spend a few hundred dollars wisely, what can you trust them to do?

 

Slow Down!

Speed and haste undermine trust. Many leaders don’t intend to suggest a lack of trust in their people, but that is how their actions are interpreted. There isn’t time to explain or coach, so they do the job themselves instead. With maybe only a few moments to make a decision, it seems obvious the leader should do it—there isn’t time to risk making a mistake. That isn’t how it will look to the staff, whether it’s true or not. Staff will believe the leader does the work herself because she doesn’t trust them to do it properly.  “She’s a control freak,” they’ll tell one another. “She makes every decision of any importance. Oh, she says it’s because of time pressures, but the real reason is she thinks we’re all dummies. She doesn’t even trust us to make the decisions that are crucial to our work.”

 

Don’t risk it. Even the “losses” caused by a few genuinely untrustworthy people, and the inevitable frailties of human nature, are minor compared with the damage leaders do when they choose to withhold their trust from the people who work for them. Too many organizations today are wasting money and resources by failing to use the full creative abilities and commitment of their people. Chronic mistrust soon shows on the bottom line.

 

It’s not just true that if you pay peanuts you get monkeys. If you treat people as untrustworthy through assumed incompetence, low motivation or downright dishonesty, that’s exactly what you’ll get. When you treat employees as feckless dummies, all the good ones will leave, while the rest behave exactly as you seem to expect. A leader without the courage to trust people is as much use as any coward in a fire fight.

 

Assignment:  What do leaders that you follow consistently do or not do to earn/inspire trust and loyalty?

View Article  Randy Pausch - Live, Love & Learn from the Last Lecture

Here is the incredible "Last Lecture" from Randy Pausch a PHD from Carnegie-Mellon.  Randy has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and has only months to live.   The professors at Carnegie-Mellon have a tradition of giving a "Last Lecture" to their students.  The first eleven minutes is Randy's last lecture shared again on the Oprah show.  Some of the key points to think upon from this courageous man are:

1. Anything is possible to someone willing to dream.

2. If you don't get your dream - you still learn alot in the process.

3. Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want.

4. People who care will push you.  It's only when they no longer care that you will not be pushed.

5. Brick walls are in your life for a reason - they let us prove how bad we want our dream.

6. You can spend your time in life complaining or playing the game hard.

7. Live your life properly and the dreams will come to you.

8. Tell the Truth.

9. Apologize (Properly) A. I'm Sorry  B. It's My Fault  C. How do I make it right?

10. Wait & people will show their good side.

11. People are way more important than things.

View Article  Xenophon's Historical Leadership Lessons

I am convinced that a person who does not know world history is severely limiting the amount of experiences to draw upon in times of crisis.  The true story of Xenophon and “the Ten Thousand” men who marched out of Persia is inspirational, educational, and filled with leadership wisdom.  There are many parallels between the five month march of the Greeks out of Persia and the last six months for many reading this blog.  Here is the Wiki history for the background on Xenophon's and the Ten Thousand's march.

 

In his advance against the Persian king, Cyrus the Younger used many Greek mercenaries left unemployed by the cessation of the Peloponnesian War. Cyrus fought Artaxerxes II in the Battle of Cunaxa. The Greeks were victorious in that battle, but Cyrus was killed. Shortly thereafter, the Greek general Clearchus of Sparta was invited to a peace conference, at which he was betrayed and executed. The mercenaries, known as the Ten Thousand, found themselves without leadership deep in hostile territory, near the heart of Mesopotamia, which was far from the sea. They elected new leaders, including Xenophon himself, and fought their way north through hostile Persians, Armenians, and Kurds to Trapezus on the coast of the Black Sea. They then sailed westward back to Greece. On the way back, they helped Seuthes II make himself king of Thrace. Xenophon's record of the entire expedition against the Persians and the journey home was titled Anabasis ("The Expedition" or "The March Up Country"). It is worth noting that the Anabasis was used as a field guide by Alexander the Great during the early phases of his expedition into Persia.

 

Now that you have a background of Xenophon and the 10,000 mercenaries, you will enjoy the leadership lessons drawn from Xenophon’s book Anabasis.  Here is a summary of the leadership lessons written by Robert Enzenauer.  What parallels can you draw from the experiences of Xenophon to apply to your life?  Enjoy the article and learn to lead better from Xenophon’s experiences.  God Bless, Orrin Woodward

 

Many popular books have been written describing the leadership principles of heads of state, Biblical figures, athletes, military commanders and even fictional heroes.

 

However, according to management expert Peter Drucker, the first systematic book on leadership--and perhaps the best book--was written by Greek historian Xenophon.

 

Few leaders outside the military even know this extraordinary individual.

 

Xenophon was one of the well-to-do disciples of Socrates who left Athens to serve with the Greek contingent "the Ten Thousand" raised by Cyrus the Younger of Persia against Artaxerxes.

 

These troops served Cyrus at the disastrous battle of Cunaxa (401 BC). When Cyrus was killed, the Ten Thousand were forced to flee or surrender to the Persians. After the Persians killed the Greek generals, Xenophon was chosen as one of the leaders of the heroic retreat from Babylon to the Black Sea, with the Greeks fighting their way through an unknown and hostile land.

 

The success of the five-month march, one of the most famous in military history, was a triumph of discipline and improvisation in the face of overwhelming odds. Xenophon not only managed to lead his men out of Persia, but succeeded in keeping the army intact as a fighting force.

 

Xenophon's Anabasis (translated March Up Country or The Persian Expedition) was translated and first published widely in English around the dawn of the 20th century. Drucker read Rex Warner's 1949 translation and mentioned Xenophon's writing in his classic The Practice of Management, first published in 1955. Xenophon's vivid account was revised and reprinted with corrections in 2001 and is now widely available.

 

Xenophon was a prolific writer. His writing is a veritable treasure trove of examples of successful leadership. Leadership according to Xenophon was the art of inspiring the spirit and the act of following, regardless of the external circumstances. In more metaphysical terms it was the art of turning the soul toward some purpose.

 

Leadership requires an understanding of human nature Xenophon did not offer checklists of recipes. Rather, he sought to establish a standard for what leadership ought to be. Business leaders should acquaint themselves with this fascinating military figure. Here's a look at some of Xenophon's leadership principles that he shared through his writings that are applicable to today's executives.  

 

Leaders expect positive results

 

After the Battle of Cunaxa where Cyrus was killed, the Greek army was demoralized and discouraged as they saw no way of marching 1,000 miles back to Greece with 10,000 soldiers through unfriendly country, not to mention that they currently faced a numerically superior army.

 

Xenophon assembled the officers and spoke to them. "All of these soldiers have their eyes on you, and if they see that you are downhearted they will become cowards, while if you are yourselves clearly prepared to meet the enemy and if you call on the rest to do their part, you can be sure that they will follow you and try to be like you."

 

Xenophon expected positive results and he got them. The Ten Thousand escaped from Artaxerxes and followed Xenophon on the most amazing march in history, despite countless battles and hardships.

 

Leaders set clear expectations for performance

 

According to Xenophon, the leader's primary responsibility in forming his organization is to teach his followers the difference between correct and incorrect performance and behavior, thereby establishing a coherent, attainable set of expectations. For Xenophon, the leader, not the followers, is to blame if expectations are unclear.

 

Leaders provide a vision of the future

 

Xenophon thought vision was key. He wrote that "there will be a great rise in their spirits if one can change the way they think, so that instead of having in their heads the one idea of what is going to happen to me? They may think 'what action am I going to take?'"

 

Leaders inspire their followers

 

Sustaining morale was an imperative for Xenophon. The commander who kept his men in a state of readiness, in good physical condition, sustained a competitive spirit and did all he could to ensure their safety.

 

Xenophon asserted, "You know I am sure that not numbers or strength bring victory in war; but whichever army goes into battle stronger in soul, their enemies generally cannot withstand them."

 

Leaders succeed during adversity

 

According to Xenophon, the true test of a leader is whether people will follow of their own free will even during times of immense hardship. Xenophon regarded it as highly indicative of good leadership when people obeyed someone without coercion and were prepared to remain by him during times of danger.

 

In describing the superior leadership of Clearchus, Xenophon noted. "When he was in an awkward position, he kept his head, as everyone agrees who was with him anywhere."

 

Leaders set the example

 

Xenophon felt that a great leader had to establish himself in the good opinion of his men and to do this he had to be a model for them by enduring hardship, showing confidence and leading by example.

 

On one occasion, covered in snow and warm in their beds, the men were unwilling to rise from their sleeping places and face the cold. Xenophon made the point of getting up, although he admitted the need to summon up courage to do so, and started splitting wood for a fire. His example was followed and soon many were doing likewise.

 

On another occasion, Xenophon was encouraging his men forward while on horseback, when Soteridas criticized him for being mounted while, he, on foot, was tired because of carrying his own shield. Xenophon's reaction to this was to dismount immediately, take Soteridas' shield from him, push him out of line, take his place and march with the men.

 

The reaction of the men to this was to hurl abuse at Soteridas and to pelt him with small stones until he reclaimed his shield and allowed Xenophon to remount.

 

Xenophon described Clearchus as a good leader. "Here was a good opportunity of seeing how Clearchus led his men, with his spear in his left hand and a staff in his right. If he thought that any of the men detailed for a job were slacking, he would pick on the right man and beat him.

 

At the same time he went into the mud and lent a hand himself, so that everyone was ashamed not to be working hard with him."

 

Leaders are accessible and available

 

As for Xenophon himself, "Everyone knew that it was permissible to come to him whether he was in the middle of breakfast or supper, or to wake him from his sleep and talk to him, if they had anything to say which had a bearing on the fighting."

 

Leaders show initiative

 

According to Xenophon: "... in heaven's name, let us not wait for other people to ... call upon us to do great deeds. Let us instead be the first to summon the rest to the path of honor. Show yourselves to be the bravest of all the captains, with more of a right to leadership than those who are our leaders at present. As for me, if you are willing to take the initiative like this, I am prepared to follow you."

 

Leaders lead from the front, not from the rear

 

During a march with Seuthes, the King of Thrace, Xenophon came to a part where there was a lot of snow. He examined the ground to see whether there were any footprints leading one way or the other.

 

After finding that there were tracks on the road, he came back quickly. "We shall be upon these people before they know anything about it," he said, "I shall now lead the way with the cavalry, so that, if we see anyone, he will not get the chance of running away to give information to the enemy."

 

Leaders provide timely and fair discipline

 

Xenophon was a believer in firm and just discipline. He viewed good morale as of prime importance and saw discipline as a foundation on which to build. He noted the harm that can result from "not punishing people who were behaving in a disorderly way. The result is that, by turning a blind eye to them, you have given the worst elements among them a chance of becoming insufferable."

 

He was adamant about fairness, as well. "I admit, soldiers, that I have struck men in cases where there has been lack of discipline--the sort of people who were quite content to have their lives saved by you marching in formation and fighting when it was called for, but who left the ranks themselves and ran ahead and wanted to get more than their fair share of booty."

 

Leaders are honest and trustworthy

 

For Xenophon, trust between men and leader was an imperative. A significant motivation for warfare during Xenophon's time was the accumulation of the "spoils of war." However, Xenophon felt that there are no nobler and brilliant possessions than honor and fair dealing and generosity.

 

"I have never had anything from you for the soldiers and kept it. I have never for my own personal profit asked you for what was theirs. I have never even demanded from you what you promised me. And I swear that I would never have taken it, even if you had offered it to me, unless the soldiers were going to get what was due to them at the same time. It would have been a dishonorable action to get my own affairs straight and allow theirs to remain in a bad way, especially when I was held in honor by them."

Leaders reward good performance

 

Xenophon instructed those in his control "... when you have come and taken over the command, you will give to Dexippus and to the rest of them a chance of showing what each is good for, and you will reward each according to his merits."

 

In describing Cyrus, he said. "Indeed, whenever anyone carried out effectively a job which he had assigned, he never allowed his good work to go unrewarded. Consequently, it was said that Cyrus got the best officers for any kind of job."

 

And, Xenophon added, "When he saw that a man was a capable administrator, acting on just principles, improving the land under his control and making it bring in profit, he never took his post away from him, but always gave him additional responsibility. The result was that his administrators did their work cheerfully and made money confidently."

 

Leaders have loyal followers

 

One of the strongest beliefs held by Xenophon was that a commander must inculcate loyalty in his men. His attitude toward the treatment of all men, including slaves, is plain.

 

Willingness rather than coercion is the better way, "I think that anyone who makes trouble for his commander when there is a war on is making trouble for himself."

 

In describing Clearchus' leadership, Xenophon noted. "In difficult positions, the soldiers would give him complete confidence and wished for no one better."

 

Leaders uphold the highest standards of ethical behavior

 

In defending himself, Xenophon called an assembly, speaking as follows: "Soldiers, I hear that someone is accusing me of wanting to deceive you. I must beg you therefore to give me a hearing. If it is proved that I am doing you wrong, then I ought not to leave this place without suffering for it. If, on the other hand, it is proved that it is my accusers who are doing the wrong, then you must treat them just as they deserve."

 

Leaders take care of their followers

 

For Xenophon, the link between leader and soldier was an unspoken contract. The care of those under his command was paramount and went hand in hand with sustaining morale. This was not merely adopting successful tactics to ensure their safety, but meant looking after their day-to-day welfare.

 

Xenophon graphically describes the problems encountered when the march had to be made through deep snow and Xenophon listed the means by which such sufferings could be avoided. As a concerned leader, he ensured that his men followed instructions. According to Xenophon, the most important thing for a commander to do was to sacrifice on behalf of his men.
View Article  Self-Leadership vs. Selfish-Leadership

I have been doing research on the difference between self-responsibility and self-centeredness.  On one hand, a person must absolutely accept responsibility for the results produced in their life and be accountable for the outcomes—both good and bad.  On the other hand, a person cannot be focused entirely on self and forget to serve others or they will fall into self centeredness and lose influence.  One of the biggest turnoffs for people is to follow people or companies who are selfish.  If I were to pinpoint the lid on most people's leadership, it would boil down to one word—Self.  Until a person can reign in their selfish desires and motives, they will never lead to their full potential.  No matter how hard a person works, people will not follow them fully until they are convinced the person desires what is best for them.  The question boils down to: How do I focus on self-discipline while being other-people centered?  This is not something that can be answered in one article—but let’s start with this excellent article from Scott Campbell.  There are some thought provoking points on accountability and self-responsibility in this article.  I remember reading a story about Robert E. Lee: he was asked late in life by a young mother, what advice he could give to her to pass on to her baby boy?  His answer still resonates with me today, “Teach him to deny himself.”  God Bless, Orrin Woodward

 

My original copy of Stephen Covey’s The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People still bears the scars from the time I hurled it in anger against the wall of what was then my office. The broken spine and loose pages bear witness to my lapse in self-control!

 

I had come across Covey’s book in the early 1990’s, a time when my life seemed to be unraveling. I was angry much of the time, unhappy with my career, my marriage, and much of life in general. I had recently begun counseling to try to untangle this web of misery and was beginning to touch on some very painful events from my childhood. For the very first time in my life, I was beginning to acknowledge the impact of what had happened to me as a child.

 

And then I read Habit # 1 of Covey’s book: Be Proactive.

 

Essentially, Covey seemed to be saying, “You are as happy as you are choosing to be. You are responsible for the current state of your life.” When I read that I reacted in anger. And Covey went hurtling.

 

I was furious at him. I remember thinking, “What does this highly successful, affluent consultant who jet-sets around the world, whose clients are Fortune 500 companies, know about suffering? He’s had an easy ride and knows nothing of what prolonged childhood trauma can do to you. How dare he tell me that I am responsible for my current level of misery!”

 

But I couldn’t stop reading his book. He had struck a nerve, gotten under my skin.

When I returned to Habit # 1, I went on to read (for the first time) the story of the Jewish psychiatrist, Victor Frankl. Frankl, as some of you likely know, is the father of ‘Logotherapy,’ an approach to therapy that emerged out of his own experience as a survivor of the Nazi death camps of World War II.

 

While I might dismiss Covey’s experience as lacking credibility for his claims, I could not dismiss Frankl’s experience. Here was a man who had suffered in ways I could not imagine. Thus, when I read the words of Frankl as quoted by Covey, they struck the core of my soul:

 

“Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of human freedoms—to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.”

 

These words came from a survivor of the most horrific atrocity of the 20th century, a man who had lost his own family and friends to the horrors of Nazi brutality.

 

These words I could not dismiss.

 

I began to realize that what Covey was saying was not a denial of my pain and trauma but rather, a way out of it!

 

The “pill” of assuming personal responsibility for my life was a hard one for me to swallow, but I realized that unless I accepted at a deep level that I was responsible for how I had responded to what had happened to me, I would forever be a captive of my past. But if I could accept that I had chosen my response, I was now free to choose a different one.

 

Hope began to dawn inside me. I started to believe that if I was responsible and able to choose my attitude, to choose my own way, I could choose a new and better path for my life. One that would result in greater happiness, greater inner freedom, and better decisions for my future.

 

This was my awakening to the importance—and the freedom—of self-leadership.

 

Since then my conviction has only grown that self-leadership is the foundation of a deeply satisfying, truly successful life.

 

I define “self-leadership” as the capacity and commitment both to take full responsibility for one’s own responses to life and to create a life that is personally meaningful and fruitful. It is the antithesis of shifting responsibility for one’s degree of happiness and satisfaction to others or circumstances.*

 

It is by no means easy to exercise self-leadership. From personal experience, I know how easy it is to become stuck in blame. I know the seductiveness of victimhood. For many of us, self-leadership runs against the natural tendency of our thoughts and feelings. Furthermore, self-leadership is, to some degree, counter-cultural. Our culture tends to be blame-oriented. I spill coffee on myself so I sue the company that brewed it. Practicing self-leadership can seem like swimming upstream. What’s more, life’s circumstances frequently are difficult to change—whether it’s a career that doesn’t fit, a marriage that isn’t working, financial difficulties, cynical colleagues, a tyrannical boss, a downturn in the economy, or a myriad other tough times.

 

It’s important to acknowledge and anticipate that self-leadership isn’t easy.

But it is vital to inner freedom and outer success.

 

When we fail to exercise self-leadership, we give our power away to others and/or circumstances. The failure to exercise self-leadership tends to enshrine the status-quo. It leaves success and positive change to chance and the desires, dictates, and decisions of others. It can foment feelings of bitterness, anger and disappointment (trust me, I know!). The price we pay when we fail to exercise self-leadership is huge.

 

So, how can we increase our practice of self-leadership? How can we cultivate it as a habit of mind? Here are five suggestions.

 

First, accept at a deep level that you are responsible for your past and present responses to what life has brought your way. Don’t deny the past or present and their impact on you. But accept that you had a role in adopting whatever negative beliefs, attitudes, and self-concepts that may have become imbedded in your life as a result of your past and present responses to life’s hardships. Give up the very understandable and natural desire to blame others for your difficulties or negative emotions. Choose to accept that your outlook and emotional responses to life’s challenges were/are your own choice.

 

This first step tends to be much more a process than an event. Especially if, like me, you have had years and years of practice in blaming others and circumstances for your pain and disappointments. So, commit to the process of learning to accept responsibility for your responses to life and the consequences those choices have created.

 

Second, start monitoring your self-talk and assumptions in specific situations. Watch to see when you are saying things to yourself (or others) like, “Well, if only they would…” or, “There’s nothing you can do when…” or, “You make me so…” These types of statements, verbalized or thought, lead away from the vista of self-leadership toward the murky bog of blame and reactivity.

 

Third, when faced with a difficult situation, consciously ask yourself, “What would it mean to exercise self-leadership right now?” If, for example, your boss has been berating you in front of others on a regular basis, ask yourself, “What would it mean for me to exercise self-leadership in this situation?” There are numerous possible answers that could be right for you: choosing to confront your boss at a separate time when you are calm, transferring to a different department, reminding yourself of the pressure that your boss is under and deciding not to take it personally. By asking the question you create the space to be proactive rather than reactive. If you have the time, journal your answers or, if you prefer, talk it through with someone to gain clarity about the best response for you.

 

Until self-leadership becomes a habit of mind, we will often need to pause and consciously shift to a self-leadership stance. Posing and answering this question forces us to look at circumstances and decisions from a self-leadership perspective.

 

Fourth, deepen your own self-awareness. The more you know about your deepest needs and values, your talents and strengths, as well as your stressors and blind spots, the more you can make choices that result in greater satisfaction and effectiveness. Self-awareness allows you to play to your strengths in exercising self-leadership. It allows you to better get your needs met, manage your stress, and compensate for your weaknesses. It helps you create circumstances that work for you, not against you.**

 

Fifth, dream of the future you want to have. While taking action is the ultimate expression of self-leadership, visualizing the future we want to have (whether that is a matter of responding differently in your current circumstances or changing the circumstances themselves) is a key for increasing our motivation for action. Furthermore, it actually increases the likelihood that we will do what we are visualizing. Athletes have used the power of positive visualization for years to increase their levels of performance by visualizing themselves excelling. Recent studies have demonstrated that visualization actually creates the patterns in our brains in advance that we will use during the actual performance.

 

Most of us already visualize regularly. It’s just that usually we envision things going poorly. Why not use the power of this mental process in a positive way? Exercise self-leadership over your imagination by using positive visualization to increase your likelihood of success.

These five suggestions should get you started on the road to self-leadership.

 

As I have moved more and more (though not perfectly) towards the regular practice of self-leadership, I have seen several positive results in my life. I am much happier about my present and immensely hopeful about my future. I have actually achieved more in the last decade than I ever would have imagined possible. And, most importantly, I am creating the life I want, rather than merely enduring what life had given.

 

Self-leadership isn’t easy. But it is vital. It is the foundation of personal and professional success. It is the portal to inner freedom. My bruised copy of Covey’s Seven Habits stands as a reminder to me of these truths.

 

* I want to emphasize that this is hugely different from denying the impact of our past or the real challenges and difficulties of current circumstances. Self-leadership is a perspective that allows you to acknowledge but not be trapped by the past or the present. It is the portal to inner freedom and the foundation for outer effectiveness.

 

** Models of personality type (Temperament, Interaction Styles, Psychological Type) are useful as tools to deepen our self-awareness. They give us insights into key dimensions of our psychological make-up, talents, unique stressors, and characteristic behaviors.

View Article  Team Leadership in St. Louis

Laurie and I had the honor of speaking to the greatest team of leaders in the world called the Team.  We have never spoken to a group that is more attentive and hungry to learn.  The Team has a goal to reach millions of people and to make a difference in other people’s lives.  Over twenty thousand people gathered to learn leadership from Chris and Terri Brady, Randy and Val Haugen, Mark and Tami Crawford, Tim and Amy Marks, Billy and Peggy Florence and more.  I am convinced the Team will reach and surpass its goals and make a global difference.  Did you attend St. Louis?  What was your magic moment from the weekend?  God Bless, Orrin Woodward

 

Update:  The easiest way to refer people to this site is to have them search - Orrin Woodward Leadership.