Orrin well put. There is way more. When I found out that previous board members had tried to get pricing reduced and were snubbed, my question is why was it not made known then that the board had NO influence. I believe there are several systemic coverups by past board members. I hold many previous board members as a party to the problems. Many perceived conflicts. Strong pressure by a few big pin uplines would distort the real story. Would price reductions affect the 1 percent pool of money to be divied by a very few? Try to get the recipients of the huge pool of money to take an income reduction is as hard as getting Q and A to take a reduction. Some board members are enablers to the problem. I hold them responsible for not disclosing the facts. If an alcoholic didn't have enablers they would have to confront the brutal reality of their problem way sooner.