Fabulous coverage of a so relevant topic. I'm particularly intrigued by the thought that were Darwin alive today he would refute his own theory due to the dependencies he stated in his original paper that have been proven false, and which were based on an isolated field of science. The modern-day equivalent is Dean Kenyon, who refutes his previous work and is ostracized for it: Orrin_Woodward http://tinyurl.com/8f9efj Intelligent Design? Socratic Gadfly discussion. Oddly, a surefire indication of anyone who is not considering the evidence or truly looking at any of the thought is when there is an immediate correlation to "creationism", which itself is contrary to many of the truths embraced by Intelligent Design. Embrace the premise that holds as true for other disciplines of design: follow the evidence.